HOME » wiiw Research Reports » Transition in the MENA Region: Challenges, ...
This paper discusses the transition agenda and provides the key economic characteristics of selected Middle East and North Africa countries (MENA) in comparison with selected Central, East and Southeast European countries (CESEE). We intend to identify some regularities in transition processes and to draw policy lessons for MENA countries. Among the key challenges facing the MENA region are job creation, fighting corruption, public sector reforms and trade diversification; the way towards a functioning market economy should not necessarily be as long and controversial as in the CESEE. MENA countries had been implementing market-oriented reforms for more than a decade. Together with free trade agreements concluded with the EU, these reforms have contributed to an increase of FDI inflows. Still, MENA countries have been lagging behind in terms of export performance, competitiveness and restructuring. Numerous impediments to trade and FDI in the MENA region need to be overcome, yet the transition will not require a radical overhaul of the existing system. The sine qua non condition is to achieve high per capita GDP growth. There is no guarantee for success – as illustrated by the experience of CESEE. Moreover, the current global crisis makes policy implementation not easier. If anything, future scenarios must reckon with a slow process of improvements and many backlashes. Transitions and sustainable reforms need to be anchored in a supportive international environment. In the case of many CESEE countries, the EU provided such an anchor. In the case of MENA, such a strong anchor is missing. A newly designed international involvement and especially the strengthened role of the EU will play a crucial role. A comprehensive EU-MENA trade agreement, possibly with an intra-MENA (and Turkey) Customs Union arrangement, would be beneficial to both MENA and the EU.
wiiw Research Reports
 |
Transition in the MENA Region: Challenges, Opportunities and Prospects (by Vladimir Gligorov, Peter Havlik, Sandor Richter and Hermine Vidovic) wiiw Research Report No. 376, January 2012 68 pages including 16 Tables and 10 Figures DOWNLOAD (Login required)
Keywords: transition, integration, foreign trade, FDI, labour market JEL classification: E24, F13, F53, O2, O43, O57, P52 Countries covered: Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, CESEE, CIS, Egypt, Georgia, Jordan, Kosovo, Lebanon, Libya, Macedonia, Middle East and North Africa, Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, Palestine Territories, Russia, SEE, Serbia, Syria, Tunisia, Ukraine Topics: International Trade, Competitiveness and FDI, Labour, Migration and Income Distribution, Macroeconomic Analysis and Policy |
Add to cartThis paper discusses the transition agenda and provides the key economic characteristics of selected Middle East and North Africa countries (MENA) in comparison with selected Central, East and Southeast European countries (CESEE). We intend to identify some regularities in transition processes and to draw policy lessons for MENA countries. Among the key challenges facing the MENA region are job creation, fighting corruption, public sector reforms and trade diversification; the way towards a functioning market economy should not necessarily be as long and controversial as in the CESEE. MENA countries had been implementing market-oriented reforms for more than a decade. Together with free trade agreements concluded with the EU, these reforms have contributed to an increase of FDI inflows. Still, MENA countries have been lagging behind in terms of export performance, competitiveness and restructuring. Numerous impediments to trade and FDI in the MENA region need to be overcome, yet the transition will not require a radical overhaul of the existing system. The sine qua non condition is to achieve high per capita GDP growth. There is no guarantee for success – as illustrated by the experience of CESEE. Moreover, the current global crisis makes policy implementation not easier. If anything, future scenarios must reckon with a slow process of improvements and many backlashes. Transitions and sustainable reforms need to be anchored in a supportive international environment. In the case of many CESEE countries, the EU provided such an anchor. In the case of MENA, such a strong anchor is missing. A newly designed international involvement and especially the strengthened role of the EU will play a crucial role. A comprehensive EU-MENA trade agreement, possibly with an intra-MENA (and Turkey) Customs Union arrangement, would be beneficial to both MENA and the EU.
Visitors who downloaded this publication/presentation also downloaded:
|
Monthly Report No. 10/2012 (by Rumen Dobrinsky, Doris Hanzl-Weiss, Gabor Hunya, Sebastian Leitner, Leon Podkaminer, Sandor Richter and Hermine Vidovic) Leon Podkaminer (ed) wiiw Monthly Report No. 10, October 2012 46 pages including 20 Tables DETAILS |
|
Monthly Report No. 11/2012 (by Vasily Astrov, Vladimir Gligorov, Peter Havlik, Mario Holzner, Olga Pindyuk and Hermine Vidovic) Leon Podkaminer (ed) wiiw Monthly Report No. 11, November 2012 40 pages including 18 Tables DETAILS |
|
Monthly Report No. 12/2012 (by Vasily Astrov, Leon Podkaminer and Jan Toporowski) Leon Podkaminer (ed) wiiw Monthly Report No. 12, December 2012 28 pages including 13 Tables and 5 Figures DETAILS |
